Smart Vintage Scan
Discover True Value
Analyzing catalog...

August 4, 2026
Most reproductions aren't trying to fool an expert — they're mass-produced for a decorative market and happen to end up mislabeled somewhere down the line. Here's what consistently separates them from the real thing.
Genuine age shows up in specific, logical places: the underside of chair arms where hands rest, the base of a glass where it's picked up and set down, the high points of carved relief where dusting or polishing happens over decades. Reproductions are often artificially "distressed" evenly, or in places a real object would never actually wear — a strong tell once you know to look for it.
A style can be copied instantly; a construction technique usually can't be, without era-appropriate tools. Hand-cut dovetails (slightly irregular, tapering) point to earlier furniture-making; perfectly uniform machine-cut dovetails point to later production, regardless of how "antique" the finish looks. Screws are a similar tell — hand-filed slotted screws with off-center slots suggest pre-industrial manufacture; uniform Phillips-head screws don't belong on a piece claiming 18th-century origin.
A "Georgian" piece with visible plywood, particleboard, or modern synthetic glues is a reproduction, full stop — those materials didn't exist yet. Similarly, uniformly bright, unblemished silver or brass on a piece claimed to be a century old is worth questioning; real patina develops unevenly and is very difficult to fake convincingly across an entire surface.
Genuine cut crystal typically has a different weight and a longer, clearer ring when gently tapped than pressed or molded glass. Old solid silver has a density that plated or modern alloy pieces often lack. These aren't things a photo can capture — they're exactly why an in-person expert opinion still matters for valuable pieces, even after a strong AI read.
When Smart Vintage flags "Needs Expert" or a lower confidence score, it usually means the visual evidence was ambiguous on one or more of the points above — not that the item is necessarily a reproduction. Treat it as a prompt to look closer, not a final verdict either way.